| Incumbent | Incumbent Web Page | Personal Web Page | Who funds the incumbent? |
Joe Leibham (R) |
Joe Leibham | Leibham's Personal Page |
Follow the Money Gets most of his money from realtors, banking, agriculture, construction, and health care interests |
F - Public funding of judicial campaigns |
F - Healthy Wisconsin |
A+ Ethics Reform |
F - Healthcare - HSAs |
Many politicians refuse to answer the questions in the Project Vote-Smart solicitation because they don't want voters knowing where they stand on the issues! They like being able to fudge and evade when being asked about an issue, and having it on record and posted on the web is the last thing they want. Especially when it can be compared to their voting record while in session.
Project Vote-Smart Rating |
INCUMBENT
REPEATEDLY REFUSED TO
PROVIDE ANY RESPONSES TO CITIZENS ON ISSUES THROUGH THE 2004 NATIONAL
POLITICAL AWARENESS TEST Ratings by Interest Groups: http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=CWI51569 Votes by Category: |
Wisconsin Conservation VotersRated Incumbent at 11% acceptance |
Conservation Scorecard on your state
senator
at:
Vote Tracker -- SB1 Ethics Bill Past Scorecards:
|
2006 record below |
(Many of those who did not reply simply do not want to go on record as supporting reforms they know they will vote against, and do not want to be held to their word. Others will say Yes and not mean it, or will vote as dictated by their party. It is up to constituents to hold their representatives to their word.)
| Senate, District 9 | Question 1 | Question 2 | Question 3 | Question 4 | Question 5 | Question 6 |
|
|
Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes |
Leibman: Over the last four years, I have worked hard to represent the views of the voters of the 9th Senate District by working to reduce taxes, eliminate wasteful spending, make health care more affordable and accessible, promote strong family values, and reform our election system by working to pass the most comprehensive election reform package in the last 30 years. Over the next four years, one of my top priorities will be to work to remove Wisconsin from the list of the “Top Ten Highest Taxed States” in the nation. For more information on where I stand on the issues, I encourage voters to visit my virtual headquarters at www.leibham.com.
F - Universal Health Care |
Incumbent has not been supportive of universal health care, and receives significant campaign contributions from the health care community. |
F - Campaign Finance Reform |
Incumbent has done nothing to move campaign reform forward. |
A+ Ethics Reform |
Incumbent voted to pass an Ethics Reform bill (SB1). |
| Bill - SB1 (11/1/05 Sequence 239) | The Issue | How Senate Voted | Your Representative |
Senate Bill 1 - Establish a Government Accountability BoardIntroduced by Mike Ellis (R) in the Senate and
It was killed by the Assembly Republicans. This was a vote on whether to bring the ethics bill to the floor and allow a complete up-or-down vote. By voting against an open floor vote the assembly legislators effectively killed the bill and did not have to go on record as officially opposing ethics reform. |
Proponents claim: This bill would establish an independent ethics commission to oversee the state legislature and governor.
See www.wisdc.org
|
Passed by a vote of 28 to 5 Voting for reform:
Voting to block reform:
See entire assembly roll call vote here and the senate roll call here. |
+ + + + + + + * Incumbent voted FOR bringing SB1 to the floor for a vote (this was the vote preferred by reform advocates) + + + + + + + |
|
Opponents claim: It is too intrusive, requiring the disclosure of personal finances.
(Isn't that what ethics is all about? How can they legitimately vote on an issue without disclosing any conflicts of interest?)
|
|
Republicans voting against reform were Grothman, Lasee and Reynolds, Democrats voting against reform were Decker and Taylor