Profile Page

District #93 - Robin Kreibich (R)

Wisconsin State Representative

Challenger	Challenger Web Page	Occupation	Contact
Jeff Smith (D)	www.sendmrsmithtomadison.com		Jeff Smith for Assembly PO Box 8186 Eau Claire, WI  54702-8186 Treasurer Dana Wachs 715-552-1439 or 715-835-3099 smithforassembly@hotmail.com

For a list of all candidates for state office go the State Elections Board and click on "All Candidates Registered."

_________________________________________________

Who won the Fall 2006 Government Ethics Voter Guide Questionnaire distributed by League of Women Voters, Wisconsin Democracy Campaign and Common Cause? See all survey questions at the WDC web site. (I) = Incumbent

(Many of those who did not reply simply do not want to go on record as supporting reforms they know they will vote against, and do not want to be held to their word. Others will say Yes and not mean it, or will vote as dictated by their party. It is up to constituents to hold their representatives to their word.)

Assembly, District 93	Question 1	Question 2	Question 3	Question 4	Question 5	Question 6
Jeff Smith (Democrat)	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Rob Kreibich (Republican) (I)	No Reply	No Reply	No Reply	No Reply	No Reply	No Reply

Smith

1. YES to SB-1
2. YES for comprehensive campaign finance reform.
3. YES to prohibiting corporate and other money to pay for electioneering (bipartisan Campaign Reform Law of 2002)
4. YES to making legislative competitiveness a legal standard to be applied by the legislature and courts in establishing legislative boundaries.
5. YES to appointing an independent and non-partisan commission to handle the task of redrawing legislative boundaries.
6. YES to tightening Wisconsin’s revolving door policy. AT LEAST a one year cooling off period should be required before officials may take lobbying jobs.
7. The accessibility and affordability of health care for all our citizens is the most perplexing issue of the day. As a small businessman who offers my employees the opportunity for health care, I am stunned each year with the obscene increases in costs as well as the efforts of health carriers to avoid coverage wherever they can. The complete overhaul of our school funding formula is also a goal of mine. The current system is weighted toward rich districts and punishes the districts that need the most help. Adequate funding of education is the real engine that boosts our economy and raises the bar for our standard of living.[…]

On the issues

Note that during this same week, the majority and in some cases all, legislators voted yes on three no-brainer minor ethics bills -- and some even sent out newsletters proclaiming how great the act was. But what really mattered was SB1, the mother of all ethics reform which would have established an ethics commission independent of the state legislature it would be overseeing. Your representative voted AGAINST this more conclusive bill, which meant that even violations of the three no-brainers would not have faced tough scrutiny. Those voting against SB1 like things just as they are, requiring virtually zero accountability on the part of politicians.

In another action, the Assembly approved by a 96-0 vote identical measures to [shorten] the legislative session -- to July 12, from December. The end of the session is significant because state law bars lawmakers from accepting donations during the session. Lawmakers also cannot ask lobbyists to bundle donations from their clients during that period. Now they can do both beginning July 13.  

 

Incumbent's record on Ethics Reform: Bad

From WDC: What's most notable about the three roll call votes is that several Republican members – including two considered politically vulnerable and likely facing tough reelection fights, Brett Davis of Monroe and Mark Pettis of Hertel, who originally voted to take up SB 1 – voted three times against making SB 1 part of the GOP "ethics reform" bills. Pettis is one of the Jensen 10 who were implicated during the former Assembly speaker's trial. All of the Jensen 10 voted consistently to block approval of SB 1.

Many politicians refuse to answer the questions in the Project Vote-Smart solicitation because they don't want voters knowing where they stand on the issues! They like being able to fudge and evade when being asked about an issue, and having it on record and posted on the web is the last thing they want. Especially when it can be compared to their voting record while in session.

Wisconsin Conservation Voters Rated Incumbent at 20% acceptance

Conservation Scorecard on your state representative at: http://www.conservationvoters.org/scorecard/sc04_asm_name.shtml    See also incumbent's committee scorecard at: http://www.conservationvoters.org/votetracker/