For an HTML version of this please go to www.ThrowTheRascalsOut.org/eNewsletter69.htm

The links will not show up in the text version. If your html is off, you are missing a lot (colors, bolding, links, highlights, etc.). Under every word "HERE" there is a link to the corresponding article, but either HTML must be on or you must go to the above page to see it.

Bimonthly on election and health care reform. Unsubscribe instructions at the bottom.

Unsubscribes: My computer crashed and I reverted to an old database. If you unsubscribed, may I ask your indulgence to do it once more? Sorry.

 

eNewsletter #69

May 1, 2008

 www.ThrowTheRascalsOut.org

Newsletter Archives

 

"It's about values - marketplace values and the value of certain stocks and investments, versus human values, family values and the value of life and health. Which side are YOU on?"  Clyde Winter

.

In this issue:

1) Health Care

2) Campaign Reform

3) Politicians

4) Economy in a nutshell

5) Tidbits

6) Give me a Break!

7) Book Recommendations

8) Contact Information

9) Unsubscribe Instructions

.

 

1

Health Care

 

2

Campaign Reform

Absolutely super rundown on our state legislators

The Wisconsin Democracy Campaign today released an analysis of roll call votes and bill sponsorships on democracy reform issues. To see the scores state legislators received and how they rank on reform, go here.

Legislators are ranked by score and divided into four categories:
  • Democracy Defenders – 6 to 7 points (nine legislators). Consistently voted for reform and regularly sponsored and worked for passage of reform initiatives.
  • Public Allies – 4.5 to 5.5 points (45 legislators). Supported most but not all reform proposals.
  • Bystanders – 2.5 to 4 points (22 legislators). Supported some reform measures but did not actively push for changes limiting special interest influence and cleaning up state politics.
  • Public Enemies – 0 to 2 points (54 legislators). Regularly stood with the special interests and worked to defeat reforms that would restore power to the general public.

 


Free speech and the politicians it owns!         

By Jack E. Lohman

Rep. Don Pridemore (R-Hartford) is researching a bill that would require independent groups to disclose their financial backers, but activist organizations are objecting because they want their funding sources kept secret. And their funders want anonymity so they can fund a cause without taking the responsibility they often preach.

If a group is receiving funds from the insurance industry and is paying for ads to support politicians to block meaningful health care reform -- opposite the public's wishes and best interests -- does the public have a right to know that such opposition is funded by special interests rather than ordinary people? If a personal contribution is made to this group, should that also not be disclosed?

It's an interesting debate, especially in these days of "values" and "taking responsibility" for one's actions. Here we could have a wealthy tycoon avoiding disclosure by giving cash to a group to fund support for a particular candidate.

A middle ground, of course, could require disclosure of corporate backers yet protect individual funders, but then local interests would cleanse their contributions through out-of-state 527s. It's messy.

A better approach is to provide optional public funding of campaigns, where the candidate(s) choosing a public grant for campaigning receives matching funds when these groups advertise against him. That removes the incentive for groups spending on trash ads in the first place, and it actually increases the "political speech" and debate activists say they want to protect.

See the complete article HERE 

 


Briefing: Pass the pork, please

Nobody defends ‘pork barrel'
 spending by Congress, but there'
s more of it than ever. Whatever happened to the push to eliminate wasteful federal spending?

What exactly is meant by ‘political pork'?
It's all in the eyes of the beholder, and therein lies the rub. One person's "pork" is another's "essential government outlay." In general, though, pork barrel spending describes the congressional habit of using taxpayer money to reward or benefit a specific constituency, company, or campaign contributor. Pork projects can range from massive undertakings such as the $14 billion spent on Boston's "Big Dig," a 3.5-mile stretch of underground highway, to the $500,000 granted to a "Teapot Museum" in North Carolina. As a rule, politicians use the term "pork" to describe spending that benefits some other legislator's constituents. Spending that helps a politician's own district is, of course, never wasteful and always vital to the republic.

See the complete article HERE 

 

3

Politicians

Source: http://www.congress.org/naco/issues/alert/?alertid=11199436

Dingell: Congress Has the Votes to Override Bush Veto of Medicaid Bill
Apr. 16, 2008 7:55 PM

House Energy and Commerce Chairman John Dingell (D-Mich.) and other supporters of legislation to delay controversial Medicaid rules believe that they have the votes to override the Bush administration's threatened veto of the bill. The comments came as Energy and Commerce voted  today 46-0 to approve the Medicaid Safety Net Act of 2008 (H.R. 5613) — that delays Medicaid rules — setting up a floor vote in the near future. That vote will come "as fast as we can," Dingell told reporters after the markup.

Full Story
Related subjects: Entitlements, Health

Vote Map: House Roll Call No. 209

Votes For :

349

http://images.capwiz.com/img/spacer.gif

Votes Against :

62

http://images.capwiz.com/img/spacer.gif

Not Voting :

20

http://images.capwiz.com/img/spacer.gif

Passed: 349-62 (see complete tally)

   

How the U.S. House from Wisconsin voted:

voted

   • Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-2)

Y

   • Rep. Steve Kagen (D-8)

Y

   • Rep. Ron Kind (D-3)

Y

   • Rep. Gwen Moore (D-4)

Y

   • Rep. David Obey (D-7)

Y

   • Rep. Thomas Petri (R-6)

N

   • Rep. Paul Ryan (R-1)

N

   • Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. (R-5)

N

Per-capita cost:  $1.70 per person!!! But Dingle doesn't have Sensenbrenner's vote, who was willing vote for the $780 billion pharmaceutical giveaway (likely because he owned over $1 million in their stock), but he voted AGAINST this bill to help insure the survival of Medicaid. Obviously an attempt to further erode Medicaid and Medicare and to help his Medicare-HMO buddies. This guy has no shame.


Good resource pages on your congress critter

http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Paul_Ryan.htm

http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Tammy_Baldwin.htm

http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Ron_Kind.htm 

http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Gwen_Moore.htm  

http://www.ontheissues.org/House/James_Sensenbrenner.htm 

http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Tom_Petri.htm 

http://www.ontheissues.org/House/David_Obey.htm 

http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Steve_Kagen.htm


Clinton's earmarks:
http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/favorfactory/lawmaker.php?id=S0NY00188

Obama's earmarks:
http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/favorfactory/lawmaker.php?id=S4IL00180

McCain'
s earmarks:
http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/favorfactory/lawmaker.php?id=S6AZ00019

Lawmakers

Name

State

Party

Chamber

Baldwin, Tammy

WI

D

House

Feingold, Russell D.

WI

D

Senate

Green, Mark A.

WI

R

House

Kind, Ron

WI

D

House

Kohl, Herb

WI

D

Senate

Moore, Gwendolynne

WI

D

House

Obey, David R.

WI

D

House

Petri, Thomas E.

WI

R

House

Ryan, Paul D.

WI

R

House

Sensenbrenner, F. James Jr.

WI

R

House

 


Oh, give me a break. Not John Gard again! See HERE

 

 

4

Economy in a Nutshell

What 8 years of BushCheney have done to our economy

By Jim Hightower

Harry Truman said, "No man should be allowed to be president who doesn't understand hogs." That's never been more true than it will be for the man or woman who walks into the White House on January 20, 2009.

If you've ever entered an enclosed, industrialized hog facility where hundreds of fattening porcines live out their short lives, you know that the smell of pig excrement completely redefines "stink." This stench will knock you to your knees, sear your lungs and brain, and make you scream for mercy. For nearly eight years, the White House has been a confined hog pen for corporate porkers, right-wing ideologues, imperialists, autocrats, and other swinish mess-makers. America's next president must not only set a new direction but will also have to clean up the mess and eradicate the stink left by the Bushites.

To help presidential contenders, congressional candidates and the rest of us get perspective on the odiferous legacy of the Bush-Cheney regime, the Lowdown is presenting a two-part factual accounting of the administration's achievements since 2001. This issue will feature Bush's domestic performance, and the May issue will highlight his international agenda. Hold your nose--and get out your scrubbers.

The 3 biggest hits to the economy

  1. Bush's tax cuts for the rich have reduced annual tax revenue available for public needs by $300 billion each year.
  2. BushCheney's occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq has cost $700 billion, according to the Congressional Research Service. That's about $400 million a day. Nobel Prizewinning economist Joseph Stiglitz says the tab is well over $2 trillion when you add rehabilitation for injured vets, replacement of military hardware, and the value of things we could have produced (but didn't) with that money over the past seven years.
  3. Bushites have finished off the deregulation of banking that began in earnest during Bill Clinton's presidency. This ideological madness has caused the collapse of investment funds, banks, and the stock value of corporations that depend on them (which is to say most of Wall Street and much of the financial world), as well as a steep decline in the value of most homes in America and a sharp rise in the cost of living in them.

See this excellent summary of the economy HERE

 

 

 

5

Tidbits

WalMart Bans rBGH Tainted Milk

NaturalNews) Most Americans drink conventional, non-organic milk from cows that have been treated with artificial growth hormone, but this more and more has been changing. WalMart is the latest in a string of large retailers to recognize consumer demand for milk from cows not treated with recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH). On March 21st, the retail giant announced that its own store brand milk, Great Value, will now come from dairies that have pledged not to use rBGH. In addition, Sam's Club will begin offering milk choices from cows not treated with the hormone.

This move follows suit from other well known retailers. For example, Safeway Inc. changed its store brand milk to non-rBGH milk. Kroger grocery store chains went one step further and decided last month to sell milk only from untreated cows. Since the beginning of 2008, Starbucks has been exclusively using non-rBGH milk.

See the complete article HERE and more HERE

So the free market worked here, and even overrode our corrupt political system. Remember in 1993 when Wisconsin's state legislature outlawed freedom of choice through a cowardly voice vote? See HERE.


Penn. governor blocks milk-label ban

Pennsylania's governor has reversed an effort to ban milk-container labels that tell consumers the milk comes from cows not treated with a growth hormone. Consumer groups are hailing his decision. Sarah Gardner reports.

See the complete story HERE

Where is Jim Doyle when you need him? Okay, 1993 was a mistake. Now Doyle can reverse it.


1993: Remember Bovine Growth Hormone (BGH)? Read this from the 1993 Wisconsin Act 476

PROHIBITION. No person may place upon the label of a dairy product a statement indicating that the dairy product is not produced from herds being administered synthetic bovine growth hormone except as provided in sub. (3). (which exempts out-of-state products)

Whaaat??? We can't even have full disclosure about the food and milk we consume? Forget that BGH is banned in every European country because it is considered unsafe. Wisconsin Republicans voted not only to allow this unsafe product, but to also prohibit farmers from labeling their product "BGH Free."

Now that's really the kind of free market the Republicans can be proud of. And they say the campaign contributions from Monsanto didn't sway them?

Give me a break.

And guess what? It passed with a cowardly voice vote, a tactic they use when they don't want constituents to know how they voted!

UPDATE Sep 1, 2008: I incorrectly reported this. Labeling IS allowed. It is optional but the people have not yet demanded it. The voice vote was obviously done so the industry could not punish legislators by withholding contributions. Cowardly nonetheless, and confirmation of the hold campaign contributions have on our state legislators.


John McCain'
s idea of temporarily eliminating the gas tax will simply leave a greater margin for the oil industry to fill with increases in their per-barrel prices. It's a dumb idea, but certainly supported by ExxonMobil. We'
ll feel the pain when the tax is reinstated, only to find that the hole has been filled, all while other taxes must increase to pay for the ongoing road budget. This is political gamesmanship that will backfire on the public.


President Bush Has Made Tax Day Easier for the Rich - at the Expense of Everyone Else

A new report from Citizens for Tax Justice explains how "tax day" has changed under President George W. Bush. The answer for most Americans is: very little. Despite claims made by the President and his supporters, the tax breaks enacted after 2000 provide little benefit for the middle-class. However, for the richest one percent of American families, tax day is considerably easier. Once the President's tax cuts are fully phased in, the majority of the benefits will flow to this small group of lucky families.

What has changed for most Americans is the very real threat posed by the increased national debt resulting from these tax cuts. The national debt must eventually be paid off with tax increases or cuts in public services that Americans - particularly the middle-class - rely on.

The report: http://www.ctj.org/pdf/taxday2008.pdf

The report explains that:

  • The tax cuts received by the typical American are nowhere near as large as the President and his supporters imply, and are in fact too small to make any difference in the life of a typical American family.
  • When the Bush tax cuts are fully phased in, the majority of the benefits will go to the richest one percent.
  • If the Bush tax cuts are made permanent, as the President proposes, the cost will be $5 trillion over the 2011-2020 period. To put that in context, the federal government only collected $2.6 trillion last year.
  • The Bush tax cuts just going to the richest one percent in 2008 will be more than the funding received by the Department of Education, almost twice as much as the funds received by the Department of Homeland Security and over ten times as much as received by the Environmental Protection Agency.

 

 

 

 

6

Give me a Break!

 

How to Tell the Sex of a Fly

A woman walked into the kitchen to find her Husband stalking around with a fly swatter

'What are you doing?' She asked.

'Hunting Flies' He responded.

'Oh. ! Killing any?' She asked.

'Yep, 3 males, 2 Females,' he replied.


Intrigued, she asked. 'How can you tell them apart?'

He responded, '3 were on a beer can, 2 were on the phone'

Ever see an elephant paint? See HERE 
 


Or see these excellent pictures HERE

 

7

Book Recommendations

See other reviews on Amazon.com

 
 

 

8
Contact information

Lohman is a retired business owner that volunteers'
 time on the issues of Election reform and Universal health care -

Contact: Jack E. Lohman
jelohman@gmail.com or jelohman@charter.net
Phone 414-477-8686 (cell)

http://MoneyedPoliticians.net
www.ThrowTheRascalsOut.org
www.WiCleanElections.org
www.BusinessCoalition.net

 

www.MoneyedPoliticians.com (my book: Politicians - Owned and Operated by Corporate America)

www.SmokeFreeDining.net (A searchable restaurant database)

Wisconsin State Assembly pages: http://www.legis.state.wi.us/leginfo/contact/legislatorslist.aspx?house=assembly

Wisconsin State Senator pages: http://www.legis.state.wi.us/leginfo/contact/legislatorslist.aspx?house=senate

 

9
Unsubscribe Instructions

To leave the list, send a blank email to jelohman@gmail.com with "
Remove eNewsletter"
 in the subject line

To subscribe, send a blank email to jelohman@gmail.com with "
Subscribe eNewsletter"
 in the subject line

The system is automatic and you must send from the email address you want added or removed.

If either fails please notify me directly at jelohman@gmail.com. Thanks.

Disclosure: I am a center-right Republican that (regrettably) voted for Bush twice. But the Republicans look worse here because they (are/were) in power and the party blocking reform. Next year it may be the Democrats taking center stage. Were I to have a political choice it would be for a strong third-party reform candidate in all seats. I do not like our very costly and ineffective duopoly. Jack Lohman

See Lohman's complete disclosure HERE.