For an HTML version of this please go to www.ThrowTheRascalsOut.org/eNewsletter64.htm
The links will not show up in the text version. If your html is off, you are missing a lot (colors, bolding, links, highlights, etc.). Under every word "HERE" there is a link to the corresponding article, but either HTML must be on or you must go to the above page to see it.

Bimonthly on election and health care reform. Unsubscribe instructions at the bottom.

eNewsletter #64

February 10, 2007

 www.ThrowTheRascalsOut.org

Newsletter Archives

 

Of the viable candidates I've settled on McCain, Obama, and Clinton (Chelsea), in that order. Romney hated campaign reform and Clinton is already in everybody's pocket. I plan to vote for Obama in the primaries because it's the best way to get a McCain-Obama faceoff. I have differences with each, but they both have good sensibilities and will do the right thing if elected.

But that may be exactly what is happening on the other side. Some Republicans crossing over and voting for Hillary, because they know she can't beat McCain. Aren't elections fun.

.

In this issue:

1) Health Care

2) Campaign Reform

3) Of Interest

4) Big Pharma

5) Tidbits

6) Give me a Break!

7) Book Recommendations

8) Contact Information

9) Unsubscribe Instructions

.

 

1

Health Care

 

2

Campaign Reform

Can you imagine this? And with a straight face!!!

Rep. Leah Vukmir (R-Wauwatosa) and Sen. Ted Kanavas (R-Brookfield) are co-sponsoring an amendment to the Wisconsin Constitution that would explicitly give people the right to enter into private contracts with health care providers and to purchase independent health care coverage.  The language reads: "The Legislature may not require any person to participate in any state-sponsored health care system or plan...."

This is a clear gift to the insurance industry by Vukmir and Kanavas, who are major contributors to political campaigns.
 


Mike McCabe: As parties cater to elites, something's got to give

There comes a time when politics stops making sense. I have a hunch we're arriving at such a moment.

For my entire life and for generations before that, we've had two primary political factions in our country -- Republicans and Democrats. And we've made sense of political debates and elections and acts of governing by thinking about where all the participants and their ideas fit on an ideological spectrum that runs horizontally from right to left. Then we label them in shorthand -- liberal, conservative, moderate -- for easy reference.

Trouble is, the old labels don't seem to fit like they used to. Record numbers of citizens no longer are willing to call themselves either Democrats or Republicans. Maybe it's just that average folks have had their hopes, dreams, worries and fears ignored by the political class for so long that they've grown hostile toward both sides. Something tells me there's more to it than that, though.

See the complete article HERE

Mike is 100% correct. It’s not the left or right any more, it’s the upper and lower. And the upper gives campaign contributions and the lower doesn’t.

But we vote, and we must vote a complete turnover in November.


From http://themiddleclass.org

 
Congress Critter 2008 Rating All Votes
Ryan, Paul (R-WI, District 1)  50% Votes
Baldwin, Tammy (D-WI, District 2)  100% Votes
Kind, Ronald (D-WI, District 3) 100% Votes
Moore, Gwen (D-WI, District 4)   100% Votes
Sensenbrenner, F. James (R-WI, District 5)  0%* Votes
Petri, Thomas (R-WI, District 6)   100% Votes
Obey, David( D-WI, District 7)      100% Votes
Kagen, Steve (D-WI, District 8)      100% Votes
Kohl, Herb (D-WI) 100% Votes
Feingold, Russ (D-WI)  100% Votes

·         * Yes, that's not a mistake....ZERO

 


Sensenbrenner’s rant falls on deaf ears

By Jack E. Lohman  

Interesting that Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner is ranting on the issue of pork barrel projects, for a number of reasons.

First because he, too, has been guilty of pushing through pork projects for Wisconsin interests, and he even votes for everybody else’s pork. And secondly, because he adamently opposes the one change in political ethics that would curtail the practice of government giveaways … campaign finance reform.

Sensenbrenner is my congressman, and was once my favorite. But he has helped perpetuate the cash-and-carry political system that has driven up taxes and sent jobs out of the country.

See the complete Blog and comment HERE

 

3

Of Interest

WISCONSIN DEMOCRACY CAMPAIGN E-LERT

WHAT:   Senate committee public hearing on special session legislation relating to campaign finance reform

WHEN:  Tuesday, February 12, at 11 a.m.

WHERE:  411 South, State Capitol

The Senate Committee on Campaign Finance Reform, Rural Issues and Information Technology is scheduled to take public testimony on December 2007 Special Session Senate Bill 1 next Tuesday at 11 a.m. in room 411 South in the Capitol. The bill combines the features of two WDC-backed reform plans – the Ellis-Erpenbach bill (SB 12) and the Impartial Justice bill (SB 171) – and incorporates a new approach to disclosure of special interest-sponsored electioneering masquerading as "issue advocacy" that takes into account the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the matter last June.

Testimony also will be taken at Tuesday's hearing on three other bills, all of which are part of Special Session Senate Bill 1, including Senate Bill 12. Also receiving consideration as separate legislation are Senate Bill 25, which bans campaign fundraising during the state budget process, and Senate Bill 463 requiring full disclosure of special interest electioneering. SB 463 is a rewrite of Senate Bill 77 which was passed by the Senate last May, before the U.S. Supreme Court decision was handed down in Wisconsin Right to Life's case challenging the federal McCain-Feingold campaign reform law. New language accounting for that ruling has been incorporated into SB 463 and this same language is included in Special Session SB 1.

TAKE ACTION: Please plan to attend the public hearing and register in support of each of these proposals.  If you are unable to attend, please contact Senator Kreitlow and his committee members (emails follow) and encourage committee support for each of these proposals.

Sen.Kreitlow@legis.wisconsin.gov 

Sen.Erpenbach@legis.wisconsin.gov

Sen.Lassa@legis.wisconsin.gov 

Sen.Kanavas@legis.wisconsin.gov 

Sen.Kapanke@legis.wisconsin.gov

***************************************************
Beverly J. Speer, Advocacy Director
Wisconsin Democracy Campaign
PH:  608/255-4260; speer@wisdc.org
http://www.wisdc.org/
***************************************************


The Shameful State of the Union
By Robert Weissman
January 29, 2008

Here's one thing everyone should be able to agree upon from George Bush's State of the Union address: "We have unfinished business before us."

Apart from that, it's a little difficult to credit much of what he said.

"So long as we continue to trust the people, our nation will prosper, our liberty will be secure, and the state of our Union will remain strong," he concluded.

But the state of our Union is anything but strong. Consider these snapshots:

See the complete list HERE
 


A stimulus by any other name

By Jack E. Lohman

Isn’t it strange that today we need a tax break for the middle class — a “stimulus” plan — to reverse the downward spiral caused by George Bush’s “other” so-called stimuluses in 2001-03?

Earlier we needed a tax break for the wealthy… today it’s a tax break for the middle class to reverse the negative results. Both ostensibly to do the same thing. One will work, a little, when the other didn’t at all.

Economy.com reported that, for every dollar spent extending unemployment benefits, our economy would grow by $1.73 — and that same dollar tax cut for low-income earners would increase the GDP by $1.34. When giving money to high-income folks, however, a dollar increases the GDP by only 59 cents, and by phasing out the taxes on stock dividends, it rises just 9 cents.

Doesn’t that tell us anything about where tax breaks really provide a stimulus, and should have been applied in the first place?

But even this will not have the total effect desired, because while low and middle income earners will have more cash to buy product for their family, much of that product will stimulate foreign manufacturing instead.

It used to be that tax breaks for the wealthy translated to investment in U.S. manufacturing. Today that money goes offshore, if not to foreign tax havens then to foreign manufacturing and other foreign investments. Who today would want to invest in the U.S. dollar?

What America really needs is our jobs back. We need the one-sided trade agreements modified to eliminate the advantages companies receive when off-shoring manufacturing and services.

See the complete blog HERE

 

 

4

Big Pharma

Big Pharma, the other elephant in the room                 

By Jack E. Lohman

Make no mistake about it, American healthcare already employs the “free market system” conservatives have been calling for, and it's eating us alive.

It is fraught with profit-taking, with the two most egregious rip-offs being the middleman insurance bureaucracy and the highly profitable pharmaceutical industry.

>>> The insurance industry is totally dispensable and must be eliminated from the system, as it drains 31% of health care resources without ever providing direct patient care.

The second, pharmaceuticals, enjoys more legitimacy because some drugs are indeed effective and have themselves cut healthcare costs by treating diseases without the need for expensive surgeries and hospitalization. Advanced and effective drugs are estimated to save the healthcare system upwards of 17% of its costs.

But that’s no reason to give away the store, or give it all back to them. Some drugs do more damage than good.

Pharmaceuticals are one of the most profitable industries in the world, even after deducting its R&D costs, lavish CEO perks and enormous shareholder profits. The taxpayers -- through public grants from the National Institutes of Health -- fund about a third of all drug R&D costs, with the industry’s resulting share equaling only 7% of their total revenues.

Where does the other 93% go? Advertising, both TV and in print, sometimes educates patients but also undermines physician advice. And on costly sales reps who should restrict their time to educating physicians instead of treating them to staff lunches, physician and spouse dinners, and “educational seminars” in plush faraway places. Hawaii is nice, but patients should pay for the trip.

Drug and device manufacturers also pay physicians handsome consulting fees – sometimes in the area of $200,000 per year or more – all to add credibility and convince their colleagues what a wonderful product they represent. And to prescribe the product. even if it isn't good as others.

But these bonuses should be viewed for what they are: payoffs for ordering the drugs or implanting expensive devices. A kickback.

Many of these “consulting” physicians also sit on the FDA panels that approve drugs for the companies they represent…. a conflict of interest we should not accept in our nation’s food and drug oversight.

Of course these companies must allocate a portion of revenues to cover costly tort expenses, especially when these conflicted physicians sitting on the FDA review board vote to approve drugs they shouldn’t have. They did that in the case of Vioxx where over half of the FDA board had received payments from the parent drug company.

If all of these pharmaceutical expenses went to new, innovative drugs it would't be so bad. But from 1995 to 2000 only 13% of America’s drugs were “innovative” and unique to the marketplace.

Even today over 80% of all “new” drugs are remakes of the older version whose patents are about to expire. Not generics manufactured by competitors, but “me-too” drugs where the original manufacturer changes the formula just slightly and reintroduces it under a new "improved" name. It may not even be better, because the testing is against old placeboes rather than the original drug itself, and may even be worse. Not a pretty picture.

Thus over 80% of our drugs and the associated expenses are unnecessary.

Why would companies do this? Because they can. Congress has done nothing to intervene with this so-called “free market” approach to medicine. In fact, they passed the Medicare Part D drug program which will transfer over $780 billion to the drug industry over the next decade, all while prohibiting Medicare from negotiating for lowest prices. And even when the average beneficiary savings is $9 per month.

And you again ask Why?

Follow the money to our corrupt political system. Over $100 million dollars per year are spent by the pharmaceutical industry for lobbying and campaign contributions. And yes, they add these costs to the product and they are picked up by the patients in need.

As well, many congressmen -- like my Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner -- own millions of dollars of stock in Pfizer and Merck and others, and want to protect their investments even when not in the best interest of the country. That's a double conflict of interest that must be eliminated.

But it’s a free market, don’cha know.

Resources:

“Bush / Big Pharma conspiracy? White House to oppose open disclosure of clinical drug trials” HERE

“The FDA still allows serious conflicts of interest in decision panel experts” HERE

"The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It" by Marcia Angell 

 

 

 

 

5

Tidbits

This is an absolutely superb 60 minute talk on the economics of the wage gap by Robert Reich. Don't miss THIS. (Thanks to Becky Spoon for the link)


Try your hand at this mathematical voting system HERE


 


Tax Economics at the Bar - Anon

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay $1.

The sixth would pay $3.

The seventh would pay $7.

The eighth would pay $12.

The ninth would pay $18.

The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. "Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20."

Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected.

They would still drink for free.

But what about the other six men - the paying customers?

How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same; amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).

The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).

The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).

The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).

The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).

The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before.

And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings."I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, "but he got $10!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!"

"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, ladies and gentlemen, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works.

The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.

For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Yeah, but the rich are already sending their cash to offshore tax havens and investing overseas. The truth is that the U.S. economy is in deep trouble and the low- and middle-wage earners can't pull it out. The rich have every reason to want to save the country and they can better afford it. 

 

 

 

6

Give me a Break!

Never Lie to a Woman!!!

A man called home to his wife and said, "Honey...I have been asked to go fishing up in Canada with my boss & several of his Friends. We'll be gone for a week. This is a good opportunity for me to get that Promotion I've been wanting, so could you please pack enough clothes for a week and set out my rod and fishing box, we're leaving from the office & I will swing by the house to pick my things up! Oh! Please pack my new blue silk pajamas!"

The wife thinks this sounds a bit fishy but being the good wife she is, did exactly what her husband asked.

The following weekend he came home a little tired but otherwise looking good. The wife welcomed him home and asked if he caught many fish.

He said, "Yes! Lots of Salmon, some Bluegill, and a few Swordfish. But why didn't you pack my new blue silk pajamas like I asked you to do?

The wife replied, "I did. They're in your fishing box!!!

Never Lie To A Woman...!!!
 

A few days ago I was having some work done at my local garage. A blonde came in and asked for a seven-hundred-ten. We all looked at each other and another customer asked, "What is a seven-hundred-ten?" She replied, "You know, the little piece in the middle of the engine, I have lost it and need a new one.." She replied that she did not know exactly what it was, but this piece had always been there. The mechanic gave her a piece of paper and a pen and asked her to draw what the piece looked like. She drew a circle and in the middle of it wrote 710. He then took her over to another car which had its hood up and asked "is there a 710 on this car?" She pointed and said, "Of course, its right there."

If you're not sure what a 710 is Click Here 


RUNSCANNER scans your system for configured running programs and autostart locations, detects autostart programs, spyware, aware, homepage hijackers, unverified drivers, and other problems, and allows import and export of results. Download free at http://www.runscanner.net/


IQ TEST..... Feeling up to another test to determine how intelligent you are? Allow 30 minutes or so. Go HERE


CREATE-BURN ISO is a professional data CD / DVD burning tool. With this software, you can burn CD-R, CD-RW, DVD+R/RW, DVD-R/RW directly, or you can quickly create ISO image file from your computer, and burn ISO image file to your CD / DVD disc. Supports dragging and dropping so that it becomes very easy to manage the files and folders before creating ISO & burning CD / DVD. Download free at http://www.nbxsoft.com/create-burn-iso.php .


See this incredible dog
 


And Mr. Bean at the Beach 
 


 

How To Tell If Your Feet Stink.


 
 

 

 

 

7

Book Recommendations

See other reviews on Amazon.com

Free Lunch: How the Wealthiest Americans Enrich Themselves at Government Expense (and Stick You with the Bill) (Hardcover)
by David Cay Johnston (Author) ISBN-10: 1591841917

Free Lunch: How the Wealthiest Americans Enrich Themselves at Government Expense (and Stick You with the Bill)

Editorial Reviews
 
Review
“If you’re concerned about congressional earmarks, stock options (especially backdated options), hedge fund tax breaks, abuse of eminent domain, subsidies to sports teams, K Street lobbyists, the state of our health-care system, to say nothing of the cavernous gap between rich and poor, you’ll read this fine book—as I did—with a growing sense of outrage. Free Lunch makes it clear that it’s high time for ‘We the People’ to stand up and be counted.”
—John C. Bogle, founder and former chairman, The Vanguard Group

“With clarity, conciseness, and cool, fact-saturated analysis, Mr. Johnston, the premier investigative reporter on how industry and commerce shift risks and costs to taxpayers, sends the ultimate message to all Americans—either we demand to have a say or we will continue to pay, pay, and pay.”
—Ralph Nader

Book Description
The bestselling author of Perfectly Legal returns with a powerful new exposé

How does a strong and growing economy lend itself to job uncertainty, debt, bankruptcy, and economic fear for a vast number of Americans? Free Lunch provides answers to this great economic mystery of our time, revealing how today’s government policies and spending reach deep into the wallets of the many for the benefit of the wealthy few.

Johnston cuts through the official version of events and shows how, under the guise of deregulation, a whole new set of regulations quietly went into effect—regulations that thwart competition, depress wages, and reward misconduct. From how George W. Bush got rich off a tax increase to a $100 million taxpayer gift to Warren Buffett, Johnston puts a face on all of the dirty little tricks that business and government pull. A lot of people appear to be getting free lunches—but of course there’s no such thing as a free lunch, and someone (you, the taxpayer) is picking up the bill.

Johnston’s many revelations include:
• How we ended up with the most expensive yet inefficient health-care system in the world
• How homeowners’ title insurance became a costly, deceitful, yet almost invisible oligopoly
• How our government gives hidden subsidies for posh golf courses
• How Paris Hilton’s grandfather schemed to retake the family fortune from a charity for poor children
• How the Yankees and Mets owners will collect more than $1.3 billion in public funds

In these instances and many more, Free Lunch shows how the lobbyists and lawyers representing the most powerful 0.1 percent of Americans manipulated our government at the expense of the other 99.9 percent.

With his extraordinary reporting, vivid stories, and sharp analysis, Johnston reveals the forces that shape our everyday economic lives—and shows us how we can finally make things better.
 

 

8
Contact information

Lohman is a retired business owner that volunteers’ time on the issues of Election reform and Universal health care -

Contact: Jack E. Lohman
jelohman@gmail.com or jelohman@charter.net
Phone 414-477-8686 (cell)

http://MoneyedPoliticians.net
www.ThrowTheRascalsOut.org
www.WiCleanElections.org
www.BusinessCoalition.net

 

www.MoneyedPoliticians.com (my book: Politicians - Owned and Operated by Corporate America)

www.SmokeFreeDining.net (A searchable restaurant database)

Wisconsin State Assembly pages: http://www.legis.state.wi.us/leginfo/contact/legislatorslist.aspx?house=assembly

Wisconsin State Senator pages: http://www.legis.state.wi.us/leginfo/contact/legislatorslist.aspx?house=senate

 

9
Unsubscribe Instructions

To leave the list, send a blank email to jelohman@gmail.com with “Remove eNewsletter” in the subject line

To subscribe, send a blank email to jelohman@gmail.com with “Subscribe eNewsletter” in the subject line

The system is automatic and you must send from the email address you want added or removed.

If either fails please notify me directly at jelohman@gmail.com. Thanks.

Disclosure: I am a center-right Republican that (regrettably) voted for Bush twice. But the Republicans look worse here because they (are/were) in power and the party blocking reform. Next year it may be the Democrats taking center stage. Were I to have a political choice it would be for a strong third-party reform candidate in all seats. I do not like our very costly and ineffective duopoly. Jack Lohman

See Lohman's complete disclosure HERE.