For an HTML version of this please
go to
www.ThrowTheRascalsOut.org/eNewsletter63.htm
The links will not show up in the text version. If your html is off, you are
missing a lot (colors, bolding, links, highlights, etc.). Under every word
"HERE" there is a link to the corresponding article, but either HTML must be on
or you must go to the above page to see it.
Bimonthly on election and health care reform. Unsubscribe instructions at the bottom.
eNewsletter #63
January 26, 2008
I like it. The CEO essentially gets fired from Countrywide Financial because he screwed up so badly, like allowing broker fraud, and he gets a $100 Million bonus. Now that's true "capitalism." In China they'd execute the guy.
.
In this issue:
1) Health Care
2) Campaign Reform
3) Politicians
4) Smokefree Wisconsin
5) Tidbits
6) Give me a Break!
7) Book Recommendations
8) Contact Information
9) Unsubscribe Instructions
.
1
|
Health Care |
|
Asclepios --- Your Weekly Medicare Consumer Advocacy Update What a Waste January 10, 2008 Volume 8, Issue 2 The Medicare prescription drug benefit (Part D) saves enrollees $9 or less per month, according to researchers who tracked purchases of over 100,000 older adults before and after the benefit began in 2006. Why does Part D yield so little savings, when the program will cost about $1 trillion over the next ten years? Because the Part D benefit is run by private companies and not by Original Medicare. Consider these two facts from a recent overview of health spending published in Health Affairs by researchers for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: Of the $41 billion in Part D spending in 2006, $5.3 billion, or 13 percent went for administrative costs and the profit siphoned off by the insurance companies offering Part D. By contrast, just 3 percent of spending for coverage of doctor visits and hospital care under Original Medicare goes to administrative costs. The Part D plans cannot negotiate discounts and rebates from drug manufacturers that come close to matching what Medicaid received, when that program provided drug coverage for low income people with Medicare. In fact, even though enrollment in Part D plans is more than double the number of people enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid, the total amount of rebates received by Part D companies are less than Medicaid received before Part D took over coverage. It is becoming more and more clear that the privatized structure for Part D has created a boondoggle for drug manufacturers and insurance companies even as it has fallen woefully short in providing people with Medicare the kind of drug coverage they need. It is time to for Congress to provide a drug benefit directly through Medicare. Older adults and people with disabilities deserve that choice. From http://www.medicarerights.org The Newest Last-Place Finish for U.S. Health CareMany people—okay, mostly conservative politicos—like to say that the U.S. has the best health care system in the world. Time and again, those of us in the reality-based community offer a legion of evidence as to why this isn’t true; the ethno-centrists wag their fingers and repeat their refrain; and so the cycle continues. But recent numbers from the Commonwealth Fund (summary below) should put a stop to this cycle: the U.S. health care system places last in the world when it comes to stopping preventable deaths. In other words, we spend more but accomplish less—does that sound like success to you? See and participate in the blog HERE
Measuring the Health of Nations: Updating an Earlier AnalysisIn the LiteratureIn a Commonwealth Fund-supported study comparing preventable deaths in 19 industrialized countries, researchers found that the United States placed last. While the other nations improved dramatically between the two study periods—1997–98 and 2002–03—the U.S. improved only slightly on the measure. In "Measuring the Health of Nations: Updating an Earlier Analysis" (Health Affairs, Jan./Feb. 2008), Ellen Nolte, Ph.D., and C. Martin McKee, M.D., D.Sc., both of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, compared international rates of "amenable mortality"—that is, deaths from certain causes before age 75 that are potentially preventable with timely and effective health care. In addition to the U.S., the study included 14 Western European countries, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan. According to the authors, if the U.S. had been able reduce amenable mortality to the average rate achieved by the three top-performing countries, there would have been 101,000 fewer deaths annually by the end of the study period. The concept of amenable mortality was developed in the 1970s to assess the quality and performance of health systems and to track changes over time. For this study, the researchers used data from the World Health Organization on deaths from conditions considered amenable to health care, such as treatable cancers, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. U.S. Ranks LastBetween 1997–98 and 2002–03, amenable mortality fell by an average of 16 percent in all countries except the U.S., where the decline was only 4 percent. In 1997–98, the U.S. ranked 15th out of the 19 countries on this measure—ahead of only Finland, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and Ireland—with a rate of 114.7 deaths per 100,000 people. By 2002–03, the U.S. fell to last place, with 109.7 per 100,000. In the leading countries, mortality rates per 100,000 people were 64.8 in France, 71.2 in Japan, and 71.3 in Australia. The largest reductions in amenable mortality were seen in countries with the highest initial levels, including Portugal, Finland, Ireland, and the U.K, but also in some higher-performing countries, like Australia and Italy. In contrast, the U.S. started from a relatively high level of amenable mortality but experienced smaller reductions. Many Lives in U.S. Could Be SavedThe researchers estimated the number of lives that could have been saved in 2002 if the U.S. had achieved either the average of all countries analyzed (except the U.S.) or the average of the three top-performing countries. Using this formula, the authors estimated that approximately 75,000 to 101,00 preventable deaths could be averted in the U.S. "[E]ven the more conservative estimate of 75,000 deaths is almost twice the Institute of Medicine's (lower) estimate of the number of deaths attributable to medical errors in the United States each year," the authors say. Future ImplicationsThe rate of amenable mortality is a valuable indicator of health care performance, say the authors—one that can point to potential weaknesses in a nation's health system that require attention. "[T]he findings presented here are consistent with other cross-national analyses, demonstrating the relative underperformance of the U.S. health care system in several key indicators compared with other industrialized countries," they say.
![]()
![]()
CitationE. Nolte and C. M. McKee, Measuring the Health of Nations: Updating an Earlier Analysis, Health Affairs, January/February 2008, 27(1):58–71
The following is from EINO newsletter-emails with briefs on health care articles More detail should be at www.everybodyinnobodyout.org The cost of providing health care for workers rose again in 2007 to nearly $8,000 annually per employee, prompting more businesses to drop the benefit. Costs rose by 6.1%, about the same pace as last year but lower than the double-digit rates of prior years. But that's still more than twice the rate of inflation, and costs to businesses would be even higher if they had not shifted more of it to the workers and their families. The survey found that only 62% of large employers cover part-time workers, who make up an increasingly large share of the work force. Some of these businesses are now offering "mini-med" plans that offer limited health coverage for part-timers.
|
2
|
Campaign Reform |
|||
If you go by the latest polling done by the conservative Wisconsin Policy Research Institute, state politicians are owned by the lobbyists and the special interest groups, don't give a whit about what average citizens want or need, and generally seem to rank somewhere between used car salesmen and child molesters in the public's estimation. A measly 2 percent of Wisconsin residents believe they can trust state government to do what is right almost all the time. Eighty-two percent say lobbying groups determine what state government spends money on, while only 12 percent believe voters ultimately control the purse strings. When asked whether the standard of ethics in the state Legislature has changed over the last decade, 44 percent think it's gotten worse while only 6 percent think it's changed for the better. And a mere 10 percent think their elected officials represent the voters' interests, compared to 43 percent who think they're working for the special interests and 42 percent who think state politicians are just looking out for their own self-interest. WPRI concludes that "something extraordinary is happening in Wisconsin." The group says: See the rest of this excellent article HERE TAKE ACTION - Special Session on Campaign Finance Reform (from www.wisdc.org) WISCONSIN DEMOCRACY CAMPAIGN E-LERT Senate committee to take testimony on Clean Elections reform The Senate Committee on Campaign Finance Reform, Rural Issues and Information Technology will hold a public hearing next week on a sweeping campaign finance reform bill (Senate Bill 182) and another reform measure (Senate Bill 160). The hearing will be held on Tuesday, January 29 at 1 p.m. in room 400 Southeast in the State Capitol. Senate Bill 182, a Clean Elections bill, calls for full public financing of all state races modeled after the highly successful systems already in place in Arizona and Maine. Senate Bill 160 aims to make sure out-of-state political committees play by the same disclosure rules as in-state campaigns. There's a long, bizarre story behind SB 160. To find out what we mean, go to our March 22, 2007 Big Money Blog (http://www.wisdc.org/blog/2007/03/disappearing-act.html). Please plan to attend and register or speak in support of both SB 182 and SB 160.
*************************************************** A new poll shows Wisconsin voters of every age, every ideological persuasion and every political party affiliation are worried about the influence of money on judges and overwhelmingly support reform legislation that would create publicly financed state Supreme Court elections. Please also take a few minutes to contact members of the committee and especially chairperson Sheryl Albers to urge them to take up Impartial Justice (Assembly Bill 250).
|
|||
|
|
3
|
Politicians |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In a news conference Deanna Favre announced she will be the
starting QB for the Packers this coming Sunday. Deanna asserts
that she is qualified to be starting QB because she has spent
the past 16 years married to Brett while he played QB for the
Packers. During this period of time she became familiar with
the definition of a corner blitz, and is now completely
comfortable with other terminology of the Packers offense. A
survey of Packers fans shows that 50% of those polled supported
the move.
When told Hillary Clinton has experience because she has 8 years in the white house, Dick Morris stated "so has the pastry chef".
Recent
House Votes
S-MINER Act - Vote Passed
(214-199, 17 Not Voting)
National Defense Authorization Act, FY2008
- Vote Passed (369-46, 15 Not Voting)
Why did they vote the
way they did? It could have nothing to do with
the title of the bill and everything to do with
where they got their money. Live with it!
Calculate your congressman's
CF (corruption factor): *
Project Vote Smart
** OpenSecrets.org |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
4
|
Smoke
Free Wisconsin? |
|
Smoke
free Wisconsin makes sense, except for Philip Morris.
This is an absolutely stupid
battle, but like all others, follow the money and you'll
learn why. Most certainly the tobacco industry money
that transfers to our politicians in the form of
campaign contributions has a major impact. That's a
given. These operators may be
good at food but they are obviously terrible at math. Why would tavern
association leaders fight a ban that would increase
business? Perhaps because they are more interested in
money from Philip Morris for executive salaries than
they are the success of their members, and I suspect
Philip Morris could care less as well. -- Lohman is a retired business owner from Colgate and publishes http://MoneyedPoliticians.net. He authored "Politicians - Owned and Operated by Corporate America" and can be reached at jelohman@gmail.com. |
|
|
|
|
5
|
Tidbits |
|
Unity08 efforts delayed See HERE (Best hope is for Bloomberg to jump in, though he says he is not going to.) See efforts to draft him at www.UniteForMike.com and www.observer.com/2007/meet-mike-bloombergs-best-line-friend-0
|
|
|
6
|
Give me a Break! |
|
With a granddaughter getting married
this year, this stuck a nostalgic note:
HERE
IMGBURN
is a CD / DVD / HD DVD / Blu-ray burning application that
supports a wide range of image file formats and all Windows
operating systems. Download free at
http://www.imgburn.com/
ULTRA VNC
displays the screen of another computer (via Internet or
network) on your own screen. The program allows you to use your
mouse and keyboard to control the other PC remotely. You can
work on a remote computer as if you were sitting in front of it,
right from your current location. Download free at
http://www.uvnc.com and make a donation if you like it.
YOU REMEMBER THAT.
You'll spend a lot of time thumbing through media from the past,
organized by decade as far back as the 1930's. Make sure you
have time for your visit at
http://www.yourememberthat.com |
|
|
7
|
Book Recommendations |
|
|
|
|
|
Making A Killing JAMIE COURT and FRANCIS SMITH
This is an absolute MUST READ, and you can read it online for free or buy it HERE. For those tempted to try Medicare Advantage or sign up for a PPO or HMO, this is an eye-opener. PPOs are essentially HMOs with the option to go out of the plan and pay a 20% deductible. But they are otherwise indistinguishable. They can still deny care and terminate your policy retroactively if you look at them cross-eyed.
|
8
Contact information
Lohman is a retired business owner that volunteers’ time on the issues of Election reform and Universal health care -
Contact: Jack E. Lohman
jelohman@gmail.com
or
jelohman@charter.net
Phone 414-477-8686
(cell)
http://MoneyedPoliticians.net
www.ThrowTheRascalsOut.org
www.WiCleanElections.org
www.BusinessCoalition.net
www.MoneyedPoliticians.com (my book: Politicians - Owned and Operated by Corporate America)
www.SmokeFreeDining.net (A searchable restaurant database)
9
Unsubscribe
Instructions
To leave the list, send a blank email to jelohman@gmail.com with “Remove eNewsletter” in the subject line
To subscribe, send a blank email to jelohman@gmail.com with “Subscribe eNewsletter” in the subject line
The system is automatic and you must send from the email address you want added or removed.
If either fails please notify me directly at jelohman@gmail.com. Thanks.
Disclosure: I am a center-right Republican that (regrettably) voted for Bush twice. But the Republicans look worse here because they (are/were) in power and the party blocking reform. Next year it may be the Democrats taking center stage. Were I to have a political choice it would be for a strong third-party reform candidate in all seats. I do not like our very costly and ineffective duopoly. Jack Lohman
See Lohman's complete disclosure
HERE.