For an HTML version of this please go to www.ThrowTheRascalsOut.org/eNewsletter26.htm

 

Wisconsin Clean Elections Coalition

Promoting fair elections for all parties and candidates

eNewsletter #26

September 22, 2006

 www.ThrowTheRascalsOut.org

 

Politicians are like diapers.  They should both be changed frequently and for the same reason.

This is a periodic newsletter on election and health care reform. If you wish not to receive it please unsubscribe at the bottom and accept my apologies for the intrusion.
.

In this issue:

1) Health Care 

2) When campaign gifts qualify as corruption

3) The Duopoly Twins Play Dodge Ball

4) Inequality by the Numbers

5) Tidbits 

6) Give me a Break!

7) Book recommendations

8)  Contact Information

9)  Removal instructions
.

 

1

Health Care

Prescription for Excellence: How Innovation is Saving Canada's Health Care System -- Free Download -- Thanks to all of you for buying the book and visiting my website. The reviews are in and even the National Post says, "It's pleasing to hear someone offer solutions to problems Canadians want solved, instead of plaintive whining and condemnation." The hardcover and the paperback are now sold out! I have decided to make the book available to everyone through this website. Please download a free PDF copy of Prescription for Excellence!


How doctors are yielding their profession to the CEOs -- Ten facts about our health care crisis, why doctors should care, and what will save the profession -- Strong opinions are offered to solve the health care crisis. On one side are those employed in health care and currently benefit from its high cost, and on the other side are the consumers that bear these high costs. While they have different motives, let’s look at the facts HERE:


Luring Customers From Medicare - By Milt Freudenheim - For years, private insurers have offered alternatives to the federal Medicare program that are meant to give patients lower-cost options than the government coverage provides. More than 7 million people now subscribe to such plans, out of a total Medicare population of 42.5 million. But suddenly a type of private insurance plan is gaining ground that looks very similar to the basic coverage long available to anyone with a federally issued Medicare card. And the government is paying the private insurance industry a subsidy of 11 percent per patient, on average, to provide it.

See the complete article HERE.


U.S. Health-Care System Gets a “D”

By Catherine ArnstThu Sep 21, 3:08 AM ET

The U.S. health-care system is doing poorly by virtually every measure. That’s the conclusion of a national report card on the U.S. health-care system, released Sept. 20. Although there are pockets of excellence, the report, commissioned by the non-profit and non-partisan Commonwealth Fund, gave the U.S. system low grades on outcomes, quality of care, access to care, and efficiency, compared to other industrialized nations or generally accepted standards of care. Bottom line: U.S. health care barely passes with an overall grade of 66 out of 100.

The survey was carried out by 18 academic and private-sector health-care leaders, who rate the system on 37 different measures. The poor grade is particularly discomfiting, the researchers note, because the U.S. spends more on medicine, by far, than any other country. Approximately 16% of the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) is devoted to health care, compared with 10% or less in other industrialized nations.

Health care is also responsible for most new job creation, according to BusinessWeek’s Sept. 25 cover story (see BusinessWeek.com, 9/25/06, “What’s Really Propping Up The Economy”). Yet the U.S. ranks 15th out of 19 countries in terms of the number of deaths that could have been prevented. The study estimates that each year 115 out of 100,000 U.S. deaths could have been avoided with timely and appropriate medical attention. Only Ireland, Britain, and Portugal scored worse in this category, while France scored the best, with 75 preventable deaths per 100,000.

Below Potential. The U.S. ranks at the bottom among industrialized countries for life expectancy both at birth and at age 60. It is also last on infant mortality, with 7 deaths per 1,000 live births, compared with 2.7 in the top three countries. There are dramatic gaps within the U.S. as well, according to the study. The average disability rate for all Americans is 25% worse than the rate for the best five states alone, as is the rate of children missing 11 or more days of school.

The report found that quality of care and access to care varied widely across the country, and it noted substantial gaps between national averages and pockets of excellence. The authors concluded that, if the U.S. improved and standardized health-care performance and access, approximately 100,000 to 150,000 lives could be saved annually, along with $50 billion to $100 billion a year.

The Commonwealth Fund, which studies health-care issues, commissioned the report last year as part of an effort to come up with solutions to the nation’s troubled health-care system. The report “tells us that overall we are performing far below our national potential,” says Dr. James J. Mongan, chairman of the team that pulled together the study and chief executive officer of Partners Healthcare in Boston. “We can do much better and we need to do much better,” he says.

Among the reports’ findings:

·  • Only 49% of U.S. adults receive the recommended preventive and screening tests for their age and sex.

·  • Only half of patients with congestive heart failure receive written discharge instructions regarding care following hospitalization.

·  • Nationwide, preventable hospital admissions for patients with chronic health conditions such as diabetes and asthma were twice as high as the level achieved by the best performing states.

·  • Hospital 30-day re-admission rates for Medicare patients ranged from 14% to 22% across regions.

·  • One-third of all adults under 65 have problems paying their medical bills or have medical debt they are paying over time.

·  • Only 17% of U.S. doctors use electronic medical records, compared with 80% in the top three countries.

·  • On multiple measures across quality of care and access to care, there is a wide gap between low income and the uninsured, and those with higher incomes and insurance. On average, measures for low income and uninsured people in these areas would have to improve by one-third to close the gap.

·  • As a share of total health expenditures, insurance administrative costs in the U.S. were more than three times the rate in countries with integrated payment systems.

Copyright © 2006 BusinessWeek Online. All rights reserved.

 

Fear not, the politicians get a "D" too. But theirs stands for the millions of Dollars in campaign contributions they've received from the health care industry to leave our highly inefficient and profitable system in place.

 

 

2

When campaign gifts qualify as corruption

The Boston Globe
When campaign gifts qualify as corruption
By Peter S. Canellos
September 19, 2006

WASHINGTON -- The news last Friday that Representative Bob Ney of Ohio was pleading guilty to corruption and faced 10 years in prison probably sent many lawmakers scrambling for their own fund-raising lists. For in addition to receiving the usual trips and gifts, Ney pleaded guilty to accepting campaign contributions in exchange for favors -- an offense that comes uncomfortably close to business as usual in Washington.

Most members of Congress raise money constantly, and the donors are almost by definition people who benefit from particular votes and particular provisions in bills. And while members of Congress know that they must steer clear of any explicit quid pro quos -- promising to take specific actions in exchange for contributions -- they also know that such deals have been almost impossible to prove.

The traditional standard for proving bribery has been that a lawmaker's actions were entirely driven by the campaign contribution, giving senators and representatives plenty of wiggle room to cite other motives for their actions. But Ney pleaded guilty to compromising his ''honest services'' as a member of Congress by accepting campaign cash in exchange for official actions, a lower standard for corruption than Washington watchdogs have ever seen before.

''This is going to really scare folks,'' said Fred Wertheimer of Democracy 21, the dean of campaign-finance reformers.

Activists like Wertheimer have been calling attention to the corrosive effects of money in politics for decades now, but only rarely -- such as in the infamous ''Keating Five'' case of the early '90s -- have prosecutors investigated campaign funds as sources of bribes rather than direct payouts to members of Congress.

And in most previous influence-peddling investigations that involved campaign funds, lawmakers didn't end up facing charges -- including the ''Keating Five,'' which involved five senators accused of taking $1.3 million in campaign contributions from a savings and loan executive in exchange for intervening with federal regulators. The Justice Department hasn't been eager to delve into the murky world of campaign finance, especially when prosecutors can make much cleaner cases involving direct bribes, trips, or gifts.

The case of Republican superlobbyist Jack Abramoff -- who funneled contributions to many members of Congress, of which Ney is the first to go down -- could change all that, and place new scrutiny on campaign funds. Abramoff engaged in elaborate shell games to influence members of Congress. Usually the scams took the form of something other than a direct payment -- a major gift to a favorite charity, a huge contribution to a political cause, or simply a check to a political action committee or campaign fund.

Apparently, members of Congress believed that such indirect payments would not be seen as bribes. But many government watchdogs think that combing campaign-finance records for corruption cases is fair game: If the point of good-government laws is to prevent lawmakers from delivering favors in exchange for gifts, it shouldn't matter whether the gift is a suitcase full of cash, a donation to a charity of special importance to the lawmaker, or the fattening of a campaign's war chest.

Nonetheless, it isn't clear that the Justice Department would have gone after Ney -- a Republican most famous for ordering the House cafeteria to rename french fries to protest France's refusal to support the Iraq war -- if all he had done was take campaign cash in exchange for favors. (Ney's favors to Abramoff's clients included helping to direct a multimillion-dollar wireless phone contract to one client, and introducing an amendment to allow another client, a liquor firm, to label its alcohol as ''made in Russia'' though it was actually made elsewhere in the former Soviet Union.)

Ney also indulged in the far more garish types of corruption that have marked the cases against former Representative Randy ''Duke'' Cunningham, Republican of California, and Representative William Jefferson, Democrat of Louisiana. Cunningham received expensive Oriental rugs, use of a yacht, and even cash to cover part of his daughter's graduation party. Jefferson is accused of keeping $90,000 in bribes in his freezer.

The Ney case includes free golf junkets, the use of skyboxes at Washington sports events, and thousands of dollars in free gambling chips from a Syrian-born businessman known as ''the Fat Man.''

It remains to be seen whether prosecutors will feel emboldened to go after plain-old favors given in exchange for campaign contributions, or hold out for only those cases involving a Fat Man or a freezer bag.

Peter S. Canellos is the Globe's Washington bureau chief. National Perspective is his weekly analysis of events in the capital and beyond.

 

 

3

The Duopoly Twins Play Dodge Ball

Update on Eisman Debate issue: We the People has successfully excluded we the people when it proceeded with a two-man debate within a three-man gubernatorial race, and they promise to exclude Nelson Eisman again in its final debate. Clearly they will win points with both the Doyle and Green camps, whichever shall emerge as the winner in November. Ah, isn't politics sweet?

If you are one of those who didn't hear Eisman's answers at the debate, listen to them in .mp3 format HERE, on the Eisman website. (Okay, so we were all unable to hear him because they excluded him. But they weren't able to mute his answers!!!)

Doyle and Green have also both declined a debate invitation by the Wisconsin Press Club and WisPolitics.com that would have included Eisman, claiming they agreed among themselves to only three debates. They obviously also agreed to exclude the third-party challenger, thus muting any chances of tough questions being raised.

But we may just have a surprise for them. ThrowTheRascalsOut.org is considering sponsoring a debate with them or without them, and Eisman has been invited. Maybe we'll have to call it a fundraiser to get the attention of the Duopoly.

We'll keep you posted on whether we can put all of the necessary pieces together. Pencil in October 17 for some fun.


Forgive me. I'm old but still have hope. I envision both Doyle and Green going down in a shroud of investigations and criminal charges and a final gubernatorial race between Barb Lawton and Nelson Eisman.

Perhaps even a recall and a new race.  Oh, what sweet music.

Rolf Lindgren of the Libertarian Party notes that if at least 10% of Wisconsin voters decide to vote for Nelson Eisman
for Governor, the Green Party will be able to select a member to the State Elections Board. That will provide a healthy balance.


More From WDC: A ruling from a Dane County judge on the legality of about a half million dollars in donations from special interest political action committees (PACs) to Republican candidate for governor Mark Green is due on Monday.

Attorneys for the Green campaign and the state Elections Board duked it out in court yesterday. One surprise came when attorneys for the state Department of Justice, representing the Elections Board, argued that the money Green raised as a member of Congress and then transferred from his federal campaign committee to a state account he is using to finance his run for governor not only violates state law but also federal law.

About $468,000 of the $1.3 million Green transferred to his state campaign runs afoul of PAC donation limits and disclosure requirements in state law. But the Justice Department pointed out that federal campaign finance laws allow only a one-time donation of $43,128. That calls into question the legality of almost all of the $1.3 million Green transferred.

As all this is playing out in court, the Democracy Campaign has found, in response to a request from The Associated Press, that 30 individual donors to the Green campaign have exceeded the $10,000 limit in state law. Collectively, the 30 contributors have given just over $48,000 more than state law allows. The Democracy Campaign has brought these donations to the attention of the Elections Board.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel got it exactly right in an editorial in today's paper saying this whole affair illustrates why ethics reform legislation like Senate Bill 1 needs to be enacted.

Source: www.wisdc.org

 

It absolutely boggles my mind that our tusted state leaders are so willing to continue living under this shroud of political corruption. Let's hope that after the election they reconsider the SB1 Ethics bill and a Clean Money campaign solution so they can go back to holding their heads high. Their families will love them for it.

 

 

4

From www.TooMuchOnline/inequality.html

And don't miss the TooMuchOnline archives at http://www.cipa-apex.org/toomuch/archives.html

   

Delve deeper into inequality with Greed and Good, an American Library Association “title of the year” (Choice, January 2006) that explores the impact of our growing divide — and antidotes to it. You can read the full text free online.

Inequality by the Numbers

Just how unequal has the United States become? We chart that question, from a variety of different angles, below. For more detail on the numbers and the sources for all these charts, please check here.
Wealth in the United States: How Concentrated?

 

wealth shares

Try visualizing wealth in the United States as a three-piece pie, with one piece going to the top 1 percent, one to the next richest 9 percent, and one to everyone else. In 2004, America's top 1 percent held over $2.5 trillion more in net worth than the entire bottom 90 percent, according to Federal Reserve data supplemented by the annual Forbes 400 list.

America's Income Distribution: Quite a Bit Top-Heavy, Too

Income — what people take in on an annual basis — also tilts toward the top in today's United States. In 2003, the nation's top 1 percent raked in more income than the bottom 40 percent, Congressional Budget Office research released in December 2005 indicates.

So What's New? Don't the Rich Always Get Richer?

Actually, no. A century ago, income in America skewed steeply toward the top, but in the mid 20th century the United States became significantly more equal, as data from economists Emmanuel Saez and Thomas Piketty show here, before turning back toward greater inequality.

Note: Different analysts calculate income in different ways. Saez and Piketty, for instance, crunch data from tax records. The CBO researchers above add in-kind income sources, everything from job-paid health insurance premiums to food stamps. That's why calculations of income shares can vary.

Want to stay up-to-date on inequality? You're not asking Too Much!

 

 

Published by the Council on International and Public Affairs | 777 UN Plaza, Suite 3C, NY, NY 10017
Voice: 212-972-9877 | Email | Copyright 2005 | Subscribe
     

 

5

Tidbits

Quote of the week: "Why is it that we fervently believe that the best way to make poor people productive is to pay them less but the best way to make rich people productive is to pay them more, in advance?” - Canadian physician Dr. Michael Rachlis in his book "Prescription for Excellence"


Seizing defeat from the jaws of victory: By David Sirota -- Never, ever underestimate the ability of Democratic Party operatives in Washington to risk losing winnable elections. To understand what I mean, take a journey with me along a timeline that traces the last year in politics.


Government of, by, and for the FAT CATS, by Clyde Winter - F. James Sensenbrenner has been a professional politician since college. He’s been a state senator and our Representative from the 5th Congressional District since then. And he has accumulated a personal fortune of more than ten million dollars. He has very large holdings in drug and insurance companies, as well as in banks, military contractors, the oil industry, and media conglomerates. His largest holdings, not counting Kimberly-Clark, are in three giant pharmaceutical manufacturers. (See the balance of the story HERE)


But watch for a gubernatorial pardon if Doyle wins re-election!!! -- Thompson sentenced to 18 months - Georgia Thompson, the former state employee convicted of illegally steering a state travel contract to a firm that made contributions to Gov. Jim Doyle's campaign, was sentenced this morning to 18 months in prison, and fined $4,000. read more »


From www.ctj.org: Taxing Talk from Mark Warner - Former Virginia Governor and presidential hopeful Mark Warner says presidential candidates should not "alienate the rich" by complaining that, well, all the benefits of Bush's tax breaks go to the rich. As CTJ recently pointed out, it is, in fact, only the richest one percent of Americans that will benefit from President Bush's tax and fiscal policy once you consider the debt burden that every American will have to pay off eventually. CTJ's blog, Talking Taxes details how the evidence does not seem to support Warner's ideas. For example, large majorities of Americans responding to the Gallup Poll say that wealthier families are paying too little in taxes.


The Asbury Park Press
Higher limits would encourage more public financing
By Bill Bradley and Marty Meehan
September 22, 2006

<snip>

There is a solution. The bipartisan Presidential Funding Act of 2006, recently introduced in both houses of Congress, would fix the presidential financing system by providing incentives to allow presidential candidates to accept public financing and still remain competitive. The act would increase the spending limits for the presidential primary and general election to an overall total of $250 million for each candidate. The act would also provide additional public funds and higher spending limits to a candidate participating in the system if they face a non-participating opponent who greatly outspends them. Public funds for the primaries would also become available to the candidates starting on July 1 of the year before the election.

See the complete article HERE.


From www.TooMuchOnline.org:

Corporate America's “CFOs” — chief financial officers — saw their average pay jump 10 percent last year. Ten CFOs, Bloomberg executive pay analyst Graef Crystal reported last week, took home over $10 million in 2005, with the year's biggest paychecks going to the CFOs of Goldman Sachs, Occidental Petroleum, and Yahoo.

The latest CFO pay figures, says Crystal, “show that when a CEO is paid hugely, then most of his top subordinates can be expected to be paid above market levels as well.”
 
Quote of the Week: The Contagion Effect
“If one company is willing to pay a CEO twice as much as they're worth, then all companies will have to raise compensation by 100 percent to be able to retain their CEOs. If a few companies tend to behave in a crazy way, then other companies usually follow because top CEOs will get offers from other companies.”

Augustin Landier, New York University Stern School of Business,
Smart Money, September 14, 2006

 

 

 

 

6

Give me a Break!

Watch the YouTube Drummer Boy

Don't miss this slideshow on our troops in Iraq: http://www.clermontyellow.accountsupport.com/flash/UntilThen.swf

Bindi Sue speaks at dad Steve Irwin's memorial service


So, it's your first kiss and several questions might come to mind:

Is it the right time?

Is anyone watching?

Does your partner even want to?

Is your breath fresh?

And the big question...

Should you use some tongue?

Then you lean in and just go for it!!! 


Fun for creating a story with your or your kid's name in headlines. Write your story then save the image to your hard drive and print if out at birthday time.


WIFE vs. HUSBAND
A couple drove down a country road for several miles, not saying a word.

An earlier discussion had led to an argument and neither of them wanted to concede their position.
As they passed a barnyard of mules, goats, and pigs, the husband asked sarcastically, "Relatives of yours?"
"Yep," the wife replied, "in-laws."


A lady walks into a drug store and tells the pharmacist she needs some cyanide. The pharmacist said, "Why in the world do you need cyanide?"

The lady then explained she needed it to poison her husband. The pharmacist's eyes got big and he said, "Lord have mercy, I can't give you cyanide to kill your husband! That's against the law! I'll lose my license, they'll throw both of us in jail and all kinds of bad things will happen!

Absolutely not, you can NOT have any cyanide!"

Then the lady reached into her purse and pulled out a picture of her husband in bed with the pharmacist's wife.

The pharmacist looked at the picture and replied, "Well now, you didn't tell l me you had a prescription."


If you haven't already you should sign up to the US government's virus security alerts that warn when new Microsoft versions are available. It's just a backup to the automated download that you may already have activated. Otherwise, when you get an alert that applies to your software, go to Tools/Windows Update to download all new patches.


 

7

Book Recommendations

These are online books/articles:

Citizen Lobbyist: Strategies for Effective Advocacy

How to Convince Elected Officials Through Lobbying from the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees

Hard to Swallow: Older Americans and the High Cost of Prescription Drugs

Checking Medicine's Vital Signs: by Michael Weinstein - Three jumbo jets crashing every two days. If the airlines killed that many people annually, public outrage would close them overnight. Hospitals kill that many patients every year because of missed diagnoses, medication mishaps and other preventable errors. Yet there's hardly a whimper of protest.

From Public Citizen:

Congressional Revolving Doors, The Journey from Congress to K Street, Learn which members of Congress have left public service to join the influence-peddling business.

A Matter of Trust - A report by the Revolving Doors Working Group that includes a comprehensive review of problems associated with the revolving door, and proposes measures to tighten ethics rules, eliminate loopholes, and reduce conflicts of interest.

Other Investigative Reports by Public Citizen

Stealth PACs Report, including "PhRMA Appears to Have Funneled Up to $41 Million to ‘Stealth PACs’ to Help Elect a Drug Industry-Friendly Congress"

Spending Millions to Save Billions: The Campaign of the Super Wealthy to Kill the Estate Tax

 

 


8
Contact information

Lohman is a retired business owner in Colgate WI and volunteers’ time on the issues of Election reform and Universal health care -

Contact: Jack E. Lohman
jelohman@gmail.com or jelohman@charter.net
Phone 414-477-8686 (cell)
www.ThrowTheRascalsOut.org
www.WiCleanElections.org
www.wi-cfr.org


www.SmokeFreeDining.net (A searchable restaurant database)

 

 

9
Removal Instructions

To leave the list, send a blank email to jelohman@gmail.com with “Remove eNewsletter” in the subject line

To subscribe, send a blank email to jelohman@gmail.com with “Subscribe eNewsletter” in the subject line

The system is automatic and you must send from the email address you want added or removed.

If either fails please notify me directly at jelohman@gmail.com

Disclosure: I am a center-right Republican that voted for Bush twice (though at this point I wish I could have a do-over). But the Republicans look worse here because they are in power and the party blocking reform. Next year it may be the Democrats taking center stage. Were I to have a political choice it would be for a strong third-party reform candidate in all seats. I do not like our very costly and ineffective duopoly. Jack Lohman